As Satanist I believe in certain kind
of meritocracy. Stratification takes care that all of us drop or rise
to certain level in the hierarchy of nature. Still we have to accept
the fact, that there is no one point where all the men would be equal
or have the same changes in life.
There is two factors which ensures
this, and those two are the genes in our body and environment which
grew us. There is of course also the problem of free will, but that I
will hook later on this essay.
Genes. Man has 99% of the same genes
than Chimpanzees, but yet the 1% makes us unique and separates us
from other primate species. We all have also certain amount of genes
we inherit from our parents, and these very much modify us as
individual.
What then is the part of the genes in
our success?
First, individual may be born as
beautiful or ugly. Individual may be born as stubborn or genius. Also
one may be born as healthy or with genetic anomaly or disease. This
natural diversity between human beings is one of the biggest
separating things in life.
If you have been born beautiful
princess or natural prom queen, it is quite more possible to make a
career as model, actress or even as prostitute than to those who have
been born with cross-eyes or visible anomaly. Here the selection of
nature does not necessarily prove that success would be meritocratic
by it´s nature. It´s just good luck.
Secondly, environment. Environment very
much takes care of how human being grows up and sees the reality. If
you born in Hollywood as a child of millionaire actor it´s more
probable to get everything you wish than those who born as poor black
on South Central area only few blocks away. Here only way to see how
stratification works in life is not just to follow what somebody owns
or how beautiful house they got, but how one manages his or her life
in the environment they live, no matter is it ghetto, rich suburbia
or even the status of worker in North Korean factory.
Only the way how man grows from the
environment he lives can show anything about his character and will.
Now, here´s the main problem of the
whole discussion. What is the meaning of will in reaching one´s
goal. In philosophy the freedom of will has been under the discussion
over centuries, and though I don´t personally take a stance between
free will and not free will, I´m still going to point some views
about the free will. Nietzsche, well known German philosopher, once
said that human beings enjoy to think that everything good they reach
comes by their own virtues, but the negative one´s doesn´t. This
kind of logic in my eyes shows itself little retard, cause it denies
the causality between things. There is always the cause and there is
always condition to the cause.
One point of this contradiction between
the free will and causality is that accepting the causality would
same time demand us to accept that free will is not always the ruling
factor in one´s success. Like, if you born as biafran child on
Ethiopia and your best change in life is to live two months before
you die in diseases and hunger, the free will can do little or
nothing to save you. Environment just puts your way too much
limitations that you could exist.
Socialdarwinian perspective which is
very big part of todays new liberal thinking of economy, basis to
idea that we all have the same changes to success in society. This of
course is total nonsense which is based more to emotional sentiments
than logical conclusion. Fact is, that men rarely are equal in their
changes nor either will they start from the same line. Environment,
genetic inheritance and will are always in little contradiction which
each other, and thus the idea that man can reach everything with
purely will, doesn´t count.
Of course, like I earlier mentioned,
there is certain stratification in life. Man naturally rises to
certain level and stays there. In this sense individual have
possibilities to success in his or her life by the frame. By working
hard and using all the possible opportunities one can rise very much
from nowhere to almost top of the social hierarchy. It´s just how
much the free will or freedom of will helps you to reach your level.
For all these possibilities just does not exist because of the
causality which would propound that will may not cross over the
causality and thus free will is only limited amount of freedom by the
natural frame.
Now, I am not PhD. Nor Biologist. I am
still interested about this dilemma. All the ideas and views are just
my five pennies to this discussion which many famous philosopher have
definitely been describing more logically than me. To me the problem
of causality and free will is the most eventual question in
philosophy. Can you make everything happen by the will and forget
your genes and environment, or can you leave all to causality and
live believing to destiny or karma?
I think neither of these things are
complete answer to my question. Reality is not in any extremity, but
rather in between them. We Satanists have concept called “Third
side perspective” which means that dualist extremities are very
often quite limited views so person who want to be free of them may
reach more clear view by simply going thorough them and watching
things from perspective which is not limited to certain view.
In my case this means going thorough
the causality and free will and between the view that environment and
genes are so strong we cannot fight against them versus the idea that
individual can reach everything one wants simply by believing in
oneself.
We of course are ourself responsible of
our lives and choices we make. We cannot totally just claim that all
the failures in life would be because of causality. Same time we
still have to accept that there is no starting line in life which
would be same to each and everyone of us, so there is certain causal
frame which limits our life. We can still reach a lot and grow over
our own limitations. There is always people like Stephen Hawking who
have grown over all the limiting physical factors by one´s
intelligence and courage.
All in all I would say that by will you
can reach much and by working hard get more opportunities to prove
your ability than you reach simply with talent and no will. The frame
exists, but in one´s own life one can reach the level they are
definitely evolved from some point to some point. North Korean
factory worker and son of Texan oil millionaire can never reach same
level in social hierarchy and outer status, but they can master their
own life best they can in the environment they live.
Same time we still have to remember the
causality between things and the effect of our personal genes and
environment. Handicap child who lives in Russian orphanage thigh to
limb restraint and suburbia kid from American middle class
neighborhood are never going to get same amount of money, wealth and
care in their life, no matter how much will or work one does.
The probable solution to my question is
that both free will and causality exists, but neither of them rules
completely over each other.
There is an old saying that “we are,
what we make our life”, which means that attitude toward the life
is the ruling factor in personal grow. Perhaps it´s just that, with
right attitude you can take out of your life as much as possible when
you don´t compare yourself to someone else or their achievements.
Just live your life fullest and do it
for yourself.
Wrote by: Janina
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti